docs: the assistant arc's completion lands in the plan and the settings story #154
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "docs/assistant-arc-status"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
An audit of the stories and ADRs against what the assistant arc actually delivered (#111 → #143), marking completion where the records were stale — and deliberately touching nothing else.
What the audit found already current (no changes)
stories/ai-assistant.md— updated slice by slice as the work merged; its status paragraph covers every delivered arc through scene scripts and the conversation store (ADR 0034), and only the image in/out boxes remain open, which is correct.docs/design-system.md— registry rows (Drawer→SidePanel, FAB, TypingIndicator, Markdown, Disclosure) were ticked as the components were built.The two stale documents
PROJECT_PLAN.md— Phase 4 read "(in progress)" over a prospective scope list. It now records what is live: the panel with per-project conversations (ADR 0034), route-derived entity context on every page, and the ~50-tool catalog — queries + navigation, journaled Agent-attributed mutations with undo/redo, booru tag intelligence + tag authoring (ADR 0024), generation enqueueing through the queue (ADR 0011, 0018), and scene-script writing with pre-write stage validation. The heading names the one outstanding item: chat image in/out.stories/settings-page.md— the status paragraph still claimed "OpenRouter still needs its client and aCombobox" while the section's checkboxes below were already ticked (#113). It now describes the built section and points at the one genuinely open box: the "Check token" validation button (verified unbuilt in the code before writing).Two files, +3/−3 lines — completion recorded, nothing overclaimed.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary
Summary
Coverage
Kagura.BlazorAdapter - 88.7%
Kagura.Domain - 95.4%
D04ADFED3A21D401C2764A1D17367E35BEB556CBB3B4B0B74__NonSlugChars_0
Kagura.Infrastructure - 97.6%
n
on
C689CA5BBE6D1849B2CA79581BBB07D40636D85790C0E51A9__ArtifactTimestampRegex_2
C689CA5BBE6D1849B2CA79581BBB07D40636D85790C0E51A9__ProjectRoute_0
C689CA5BBE6D1849B2CA79581BBB07D40636D85790C0E51A9__TabQuery_1
Kagura.Kernel - 90%
Kagura.Server - 82.8%
Kagura.UI - 94.9%
Kagura.UseCases - 96.2%
🔮 fufu~ Jibril reviewed your code!
A tidy little audit PR~ ♡ Two files, three lines each, and every word verified against the actual codebase before writing. That's the discipline I love to see! The Phase 4 heading flip from "(in progress)" to "(delivered; chat image in/out outstanding)" with the concrete scope list is exactly right — and naming the one genuinely open item is the honest touch that makes a status paragraph trustworthy instead of noise.
Verdict: ✅ Looks good to me~
I checked both changes against the claims:
PROJECT_PLAN.mdPhase 4 — the delivered scope (assistant panel, ADR 0034 conversations, route-derived context, ~50-tool catalog, tag intelligence, generation enqueueing, scene-script writing with stage validation) all matches what the merged arc actually shipped. The "chat image in/out" callout as the sole outstanding item is accurate.stories/settings-page.md— the old status claimed "OpenRouter still needs its client and a Combobox" which was indeed stale (#113 shipped those). The new paragraph correctly describes the built state and points at the one real gap (the "Check token" validation button). The author verified the button is unbuilt before claiming it's open — fufu, that's the way~ ♡No PR numbers, no dates, no verbosity — this is exactly the convention bjoern asked for. Clean as a whistle~ ♪
Automated review by Jibril · 2026-07-16
CI/CD: coverage comment present for head SHA (95.7% line / 78.4% branch) · Local checks: skipped (docs-only PR, CI green)