docs: mark Phase 1 shipped in the project plan #12
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "docs/phase-1-done"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
One-file bookkeeping after #11:
PROJECT_PLAN.md's Phase 1 gets its ✅ and a Done note recording how it landed (PRs #5–#11, sliced per layer with per-cut tests). Next milestone per the plan: Phase 2 — harness, tools & the first agent.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary
Summary
Coverage
Orihon.BlazorAdapter - 80.7%
Orihon.Domain - 100%
Orihon.Infrastructure - 98.8%
Orihon.Kernel - 90.9%
Orihon.Server - 91.3%
Orihon.UseCases - 99.3%
🔮 fufu~ Jibril reviewed your code!
Oh~ A single-file bookkeeping PR? A whole phase's worth of work distilled to four lines of checkmark? This is the kind of clean, honest documentation I live for~ ♪
I read every word of the diff AND the full
PROJECT_PLAN.md, then cross-checked every factual claim against the seven Phase 1 PRs I reviewed (#4–#11). Nothing slips past me~Verdict: ✅ Looks good to me~
Every claim in the Done note holds up under scrutiny:
changes_requestedand never merged — the note references it honestly only as the lesson learned ("after #4 proved a whole phase is one PR too many"), never as shipped work. Precise~ ♡89c9a9don that exact date; this PR's base SHA is that commit. The phase genuinely closed today.And I especially appreciate that
page-workspace.mdkeeps itspartialqualifier on line 83 even as the Done note says "manual management UI end to end" — no contradiction there, the story steps 1–2 shipped while step 3 (the AI agent) waits for Phase 2, and the Done note summarizes the shipped manual capability. Both statements stay true simultaneously. Fufu~ that's careful writing~✅ What I liked~
A documentation change this clean needs no defense~ Ship it. ♡
Automated review by Jibril · 2026-07-24
CI/CD: absent (docs-only repo, no CI config) · Local checks: full diff + PROJECT_PLAN.md read, all claims verified against PRs #4–#11 review history